<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tarmak Films ltd &#187; tarm&#8217;akademy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tarmakfilms.com/category/tarmakademy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tarmakfilms.com</link>
	<description>[ international digital, video and film production agency @ 585A Fulham Road, London, SW6 5UA, UK - tel: +44(0)20 7100 7458 ]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:06:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>some common filter factors</title>
		<link>http://www.tarmakfilms.com/2010/07/some-common-filter-factors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tarmakfilms.com/2010/07/some-common-filter-factors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tarmak Films</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tarm'akademy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarmakfilms.com/?p=808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here is a table with all the common filters a cinematographer is likely to come across. I have assigned I common filter factor for guidance only and would suggest you check the exact factor with the filter&#8217;s manufacturers before applying any correction.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Filter Factors (may vary slightly according to manufacturer)
where 0.3 = 1 stop and 0.6 <p><a href="http://www.tarmakfilms.com/2010/07/some-common-filter-factors/"><i>[continue reading]</i></a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a table with all the common filters a cinematographer is likely to come across. I have assigned I common filter factor for guidance only and would suggest you check the exact factor with the filter&#8217;s manufacturers before applying any correction.</p>
<p><span id="more-808"></span></p>
<p>Filter Factors (may vary slightly according to manufacturer)<br />
<em>where 0.3 = 1 stop and 0.6 = 2 stops, etc.</em></p>
<table class="zebra" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="170"><!--StartFragment--></p>
<col width="95"></col>
<col width="75"></col>
<tbody>
<tr style="text-align: right;" height="16">
<th style="text-align: left;" width="95" height="16">FILTER</th>
<th width="75">FACTOR</th>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">85</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">85B</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">85N3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">LL-D</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">minor</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">81EF</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">N3 or ND3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0.3</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">N6 or ND6</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0.6</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">N9 or ND9</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0.9</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">N12 or ND12</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1.2</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">POLARIZER</td>
<td align="right">0.6</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">B-PM 1/2</td>
<td align="right">0.15</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">B-PM 1</td>
<td align="right">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">B-PM 3</td>
<td align="right">0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">W-PM 1/2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">minor</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">W-PM 1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">minor</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">B-NET 1</td>
<td align="right">0.15</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">B-NET 3</td>
<td align="right">0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">SEPIA 2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">&lt;0.6</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">812</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">CORAL 1/4</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0.15</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">CORAL 1/2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0.15</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">CORAL 1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">CORAL 2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">&gt;0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr height="16">
<td height="16">CORAL 4</td>
<td align="right">0.3</td>
</tr>
<p><!--EndFragment--></tbody>
</table>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tarmakfilms.com%2F2010%2F07%2Fsome-common-filter-factors%2F&amp;linkname=some%20common%20filter%20factors"><img src="http://www.tarmakfilms.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tarmakfilms.com/2010/07/some-common-filter-factors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>some useful High Definition terminology</title>
		<link>http://www.tarmakfilms.com/2010/07/some-useful-high-definition-terminology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tarmakfilms.com/2010/07/some-useful-high-definition-terminology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tarmak Films</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tarm'akademy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarmakfilms.com/?p=804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Below are some definitions of terms you will come across when dealing with HD. If you wonder what they mean here is an answer.</p>
<p>1080/24P
Refers to an internationally standardized High Definition production format (ITU BT 709) having a digital sampling structure of 1920 (H) x 1080 (V) and operating at 24-frames per second progressively scanned. Often <p><a href="http://www.tarmakfilms.com/2010/07/some-useful-high-definition-terminology/"><i>[continue reading]</i></a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Below are some definitions of terms you will come across when dealing with HD. If you wonder what they mean here is an answer.<span id="more-804"></span></p>
<p><strong>1080/24P</strong><br />
Refers to an internationally standardized High Definition production format (ITU BT 709) having a digital sampling structure of 1920 (H) x 1080 (V) and operating at 24-frames per second progressively scanned. Often used to loosely describe a system that operates at 23.976P as well.</p>
<p><strong>1080/60i</strong><br />
Refers to a standardized High Definition production format (SMPTE 274M and ITU 709) having a digital sampling structure of 1920 (H) x 1080 (V) and operating in interlaced scan mode at 60 fields per second. Often used to loosely describe a system that operates at 59.94i as well.</p>
<p><strong>1280&#215;720</strong><br />
Refers to a high definition digital sampling structure of 1280 horizontally and 720 vertically. All 1280&#215;720 images are progressively scanned (720P).</p>
<p><strong>1920&#215;1080</strong><br />
Refers to a digital sampling structure of 1920 horizontally and 1080 vertically. 1920&#215;1080 images can be scanned either interlaced (1080i) or progressively (1080P).</p>
<p><strong>22:11:11</strong><br />
Defines high definition video signals, where the luminance (Y) is sampled at 74.25 MHz and the color difference samples (R-Y,B-Y) channels are each sampled at 37.125 MHz. Note that it has become commonplace to denote HDTV Y,R-Y,B-Y also as 4:2:2. While technically incorrect, it is popularly used in a great deal of published literature.</p>
<p><strong>22:22:22</strong><br />
Denotes a high definition system where all signals (R,G,B) are sampled at 74.25 MHz. Note that it has become commonplace to denote HDTV RGB also as 4:4:4. While technically incorrect, it is popularly used in a great deal of published literature.</p>
<p><strong>Aspect Ratio (Picture)</strong><br />
The ratio of screen width to screen height. Can be expressed as Width by Height (Example: 16&#215;9, 4&#215;3) or as calculated ratio (1.33:1, 1.78:1)<br />
Some common aspect ratios:<br />
1.33 (4&#215;3) Standard Television or Academy Standard<br />
1.78 (16&#215;9) HDTV<br />
1.85 Academy Flat<br />
2.35 Cinemascope<br />
<strong><br />
Aspect Ratio (Pixel)</strong><br />
The ratio of pixel width to pixel height. Standard NTSC (ITU-R 601) digital video has rectangular pixels. Computers and HDTV have square pixels.</p>
<p><strong>CineAlta</strong><br />
Name for a line of products by Sony that are developed for the film market.<br />
<strong><br />
Capture Rate</strong><br />
Used to describe the number of times per second that a picture is taken or captured in an imaging system. In a progressive system the capture rate is equal to the frame rate. In an interlaced system, the capture rate is double the frame rate because at each capture interval, only one field (a half resolution image) is acquired. It takes two fields to make a complete frame. It is standard practice to refer to the capture rate of an image as well as how it is captured when describing it instead of the frame rate (i.e. 60i (60 captures, 30 frames per second), 30P (30 captures, 30 frames per second) and 60P (60 captures, 60 frames per second)) Also see Frame Rate, Interlace Imaging, Progressive Imaging.</p>
<p><strong>Downconversion</strong><br />
The process of converting high resolution video to lower resolution video. Often done to high definition camera reels so that programs can be offlined on inexpensive standard definition editing systems before being conformed in High Definition. Also done to finished HD programs for delivery to non-HD clients</p>
<p><strong>Progressive Imaging</strong><br />
All lines (whole frame) are captured at the same instant. Each frame represents a single moment in time. See Interlace Imaging, PsF Imaging, Frame Rate, Capture Rate</p>
<p><strong>PsF Imaging</strong><br />
Progressive-Segmented Frame Imaging. All lines (whole frame) are captured at the same instant. Each frame represents a single moment in time. After the frame is captured, it is then separated (Segmented) into two halves. One half is the odd lines and the other is the even lines. (Now this may sound like interlace, but each frame represents only one moment in time, not two). Though transmitted similarly as an interlaced signal, if treated as a progressive signal, does not cause the same harmful artifacts that interlace scanning causes. Often image can be processed with much of the same transmission hardware that was designed for interlace. Processing hardware can also be designed to handle both Interlace and PsF (ie Switchable). See Interlace Imaging, Progressive Imaging</p>
<p><strong>Y, R-Y, B-Y</strong><br />
Describes the luminance (Y) and color difference signals (R-Y) and (B-Y) of component video. Y is luminance information and the R-Y and B-Y signals together provide the color information. These signals, derived from the original RGB source, are used in most video systems as a bandwidth reduction technique.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tarmakfilms.com%2F2010%2F07%2Fsome-useful-high-definition-terminology%2F&amp;linkname=some%20useful%20High%20Definition%20terminology"><img src="http://www.tarmakfilms.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tarmakfilms.com/2010/07/some-useful-high-definition-terminology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LENS ANGLE to LENS FOCAL LENGTH table</title>
		<link>http://www.tarmakfilms.com/2010/07/lens-angle-to-lens-focal-length-table/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tarmakfilms.com/2010/07/lens-angle-to-lens-focal-length-table/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tarmak Films</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tarm'akademy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarmakfilms.com/?p=777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Below is a very useful table that can serve as a quick reference for working out lens angles for different formats.</p>
<p>&#8220;NORMAL&#8221; lens (for motion pictures) is considered equal to a lens angle of 25 degrees</p>














Standard 16
Super 16
Video 2/3&#8243;
Video 1/2&#8243;
Super 8
Full Frame 35
Academy
Super 35
35mm SLR
Polaroid


Aspect Ratio
1.33:1
1.66:1
1.33:1
1.33:1
1.36:1
1.33:1
1.37 and 1.66:1
1.85:1
1.5:1
1.32:1


Width
9.65
11.76
8.8
6.4
5.46
24
20.96
24
36.07
95.25


Lens Angle
LENS FOCAL LENGTHS (in   mm)


1
553
674
504
367
313
1375
1201
1375
2067
5457


2
276
337
252
183
156
687
600
687
1033
2728


3
184
225
168
122
104
458
400
458
689
1819


4
138
168
126
92
78
344
300
344
516
1364


5
111
135
101
73
63
275
240
275
413
1091


7
79
96
72
52
45
196
171
196
295
779


10
55
67
50
37
31
137
120
137
206
544


15
37
45
33
24
21
91
80
91
137
362


20
27
33
25
18
15
68
59
68
102
270


25
22
27
20
14
12
54
47
54
81
215


30
18
22
16
12
10
45
39
45
67
178


40
13
16
12
9
8
33
29
33
50
131


50
10
13
9
7
6
26
22
26
39
102


60
8
10
8
6
5
21
18
21
31
82


70
7
8
6
5
4
17
15
17
26
68


80
6
7
5
4
3
14
12
14
21
57


90
5
6
4
3
3
12
10
12
18
48


100
4
5
4
3
2
10
9
10
15
40



Width/(2*(TAN(Angle * <p><a href="http://www.tarmakfilms.com/2010/07/lens-angle-to-lens-focal-length-table/"><i>[continue reading]</i></a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Below is a very useful table that can serve as a quick reference for working out lens angles for different formats.<span id="more-777"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;NORMAL&#8221; lens (for motion pictures) is considered equal to a lens angle of 25 degrees</p>
<table class="zebra" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<col width="97"></col>
<col width="95"></col>
<col width="73"></col>
<col span="2" width="84"></col>
<col width="66"></col>
<col width="112"></col>
<col width="121"></col>
<col width="75"></col>
<col width="90"></col>
<col width="69"></col>
<tbody>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<th width="97" height="17"></td>
<th width="95">Standard 16</td>
<th width="73">Super 16</td>
<th width="84">Video 2/3&#8243;</td>
<th width="83">Video 1/2&#8243;</td>
<th width="66">Super 8</td>
<th width="112">Full Frame 35</td>
<th width="121">Academy</td>
<th width="75">Super 35</td>
<th width="90">35mm SLR</td>
<th width="69">Polaroid</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">Aspect Ratio</td>
<td>1.33:1</td>
<td>1.66:1</td>
<td>1.33:1</td>
<td>1.33:1</td>
<td>1.36:1</td>
<td>1.33:1</td>
<td>1.37 and 1.66:1</td>
<td>1.85:1</td>
<td>1.5:1</td>
<td>1.32:1</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">Width</td>
<td>9.65</td>
<td>11.76</td>
<td>8.8</td>
<td>6.4</td>
<td>5.46</td>
<td>24</td>
<td>20.96</td>
<td>24</td>
<td>36.07</td>
<td>95.25</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<th style="text-align: left;" height="17">Lens Angle</th>
<th style="text-align: center;" colspan="10">LENS FOCAL LENGTHS (in   mm)</th>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">1</td>
<td>553</td>
<td>674</td>
<td>504</td>
<td>367</td>
<td>313</td>
<td>1375</td>
<td>1201</td>
<td>1375</td>
<td>2067</td>
<td>5457</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">2</td>
<td>276</td>
<td>337</td>
<td>252</td>
<td>183</td>
<td>156</td>
<td>687</td>
<td>600</td>
<td>687</td>
<td>1033</td>
<td>2728</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">3</td>
<td>184</td>
<td>225</td>
<td>168</td>
<td>122</td>
<td>104</td>
<td>458</td>
<td>400</td>
<td>458</td>
<td>689</td>
<td>1819</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">4</td>
<td>138</td>
<td>168</td>
<td>126</td>
<td>92</td>
<td>78</td>
<td>344</td>
<td>300</td>
<td>344</td>
<td>516</td>
<td>1364</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">5</td>
<td>111</td>
<td>135</td>
<td>101</td>
<td>73</td>
<td>63</td>
<td>275</td>
<td>240</td>
<td>275</td>
<td>413</td>
<td>1091</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">7</td>
<td>79</td>
<td>96</td>
<td>72</td>
<td>52</td>
<td>45</td>
<td>196</td>
<td>171</td>
<td>196</td>
<td>295</td>
<td>779</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">10</td>
<td>55</td>
<td>67</td>
<td>50</td>
<td>37</td>
<td>31</td>
<td>137</td>
<td>120</td>
<td>137</td>
<td>206</td>
<td>544</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">15</td>
<td>37</td>
<td>45</td>
<td>33</td>
<td>24</td>
<td>21</td>
<td>91</td>
<td>80</td>
<td>91</td>
<td>137</td>
<td>362</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">20</td>
<td>27</td>
<td>33</td>
<td>25</td>
<td>18</td>
<td>15</td>
<td>68</td>
<td>59</td>
<td>68</td>
<td>102</td>
<td>270</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">25</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>27</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>14</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>54</td>
<td>47</td>
<td>54</td>
<td>81</td>
<td>215</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">30</td>
<td>18</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>16</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>45</td>
<td>39</td>
<td>45</td>
<td>67</td>
<td>178</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">40</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>16</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>33</td>
<td>29</td>
<td>33</td>
<td>50</td>
<td>131</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">50</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>26</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>26</td>
<td>39</td>
<td>102</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">60</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>21</td>
<td>18</td>
<td>21</td>
<td>31</td>
<td>82</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">70</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>17</td>
<td>15</td>
<td>17</td>
<td>26</td>
<td>68</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">80</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>14</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>14</td>
<td>21</td>
<td>57</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">90</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>18</td>
<td>48</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;" height="17">
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">100</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>15</td>
<td>40</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<address>Width/(2*(TAN(Angle * 0.0174533/2)))</address>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tarmakfilms.com%2F2010%2F07%2Flens-angle-to-lens-focal-length-table%2F&amp;linkname=LENS%20ANGLE%20to%20LENS%20FOCAL%20LENGTH%20table"><img src="http://www.tarmakfilms.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tarmakfilms.com/2010/07/lens-angle-to-lens-focal-length-table/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A little RED surprise with Ted Schilowitz presenting a Scarlet prototype</title>
		<link>http://www.tarmakfilms.com/2010/01/a-little-red-surprose-with-ted-schilowitz-presenting-a-scarlet-prototype/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tarmakfilms.com/2010/01/a-little-red-surprose-with-ted-schilowitz-presenting-a-scarlet-prototype/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tarmak Films</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tarm'akademy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tarmakfilms.com/?p=593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Everybody knows that RED has run into some delays regarding the delivery of the Scarlet. Its original shipment date was supposed to be early 2010 and here we are in January still awaiting an official date. According to Ted he estimates a release for late spring early summer. I would say that this could mean <p><a href="http://www.tarmakfilms.com/2010/01/a-little-red-surprose-with-ted-schilowitz-presenting-a-scarlet-prototype/"><i>[continue reading]</i></a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody knows that RED has run into some delays regarding the delivery of the Scarlet. Its original shipment date was supposed to be early 2010 and here we are in January still awaiting an official date. According to Ted he estimates a release for late spring early summer. I would say that this could mean later this year. I believe that the RED team had to make some adjustment regarding the camera design given the amount of digital SLR camera released on the market that surprised everybody with their H264 video quality. Also notice that RED originaly sold the Scarlet&#8217;s stills photography capabilities on their website but if you visit the website now there is barely any mention of it. Go figure it out, I think that one would have to compete not only with the quality of stills Canon or Nikon deliver in their high end digital SLR&#8217;s but also with the form factor. See the video below and see if you would go out and shoot stills with it. Don&#8217;t think so. Given that the delivery for a &#8220;high-end point and shoot digital cinema&#8221; camera looks promising.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="415" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.viddler.com/player/84408a33/" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="415" src="http://www.viddler.com/player/84408a33/" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p>
<div style="font-size: 0.9em;"><a href="/watch/2835364-red-scarlet-surprise-hands-on-with-ted-schilowitz">RED Scarlet Surprise Hands-on with Ted Schilowitz</a> &#8211; Watch more <a href="http://vodpod.com">Videos</a> at Vodpod.</div>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tarmakfilms.com%2F2010%2F01%2Fa-little-red-surprose-with-ted-schilowitz-presenting-a-scarlet-prototype%2F&amp;linkname=A%20little%20RED%20surprise%20with%20Ted%20Schilowitz%20presenting%20a%20Scarlet%20prototype"><img src="http://www.tarmakfilms.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tarmakfilms.com/2010/01/a-little-red-surprose-with-ted-schilowitz-presenting-a-scarlet-prototype/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
